Hi, I’m new to this forum. I consider myself an experimental photographer and one of my loves as a subject is architecture. The lines and patterns really are what draw my eye in. Not to mention old buildings versus new, love them all.
Recently, I was told by another photographer that the floor is extremely important when shooting Architectural shots. And while I would agree depending on the shot, sometimes I feel that the interest is in the whole building or in pieces of it, regardless of whether or not there is a floor.
For example, here is a link to a shot I took recently, that I call Vertigo. It was taken of this really fantastic building in Milwaukee WI. The glass partition in the back is the building, whereas the white part in front is the parking structure for the building. I shot it this way on purpose, how the lines and patterns of the buildings framed in my mind for the shot.
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/30256453/
Now would this be considered bad architectural photography or good?
Most importantly, I would love to hear from you all on what you think makes a good architectural shot versus a bad one. What are the “Rules” of Architectural Photography?
Thanks again!
Abby
